Examples of community development:
Colombia: Members of the COSURCA coffee cooperative successfully  prevented the cultivation of more than 1,600 acres (6.5 km2) of coca and  poppy used to produce illicit drugs.
Guatemala: indigenous Tzutuhil Mayans in the La Voz cooperative are  sending local kids to college for the first time. 
Peru: the CECOVASA cooperative is assisting indigenous groups in  improving coffee quality and transitioning to certified organic  production.
Nicaragua: The CECOCAFEN cooperative established a reproductive health  program providing tests for the virus that causes cervical cancer.
In 1997, Fairtrade Labelling Organizations International, or FLO was  created to support and protect disadvantaged producers within the Fair  Trade market. FLO is a non-profit organization based in Bonn, Germany,  that sets Fair Trade Certification standards and certifies  producers.This umbrella organization has 20 labeling initiatives  worldwide that work within it to certify the products. The FLO sets  the price floor for the coffee. The current pricing is available on the  FLO website .
Popularity
Many coffee vendors are now advertising Fair Trade certified coffee.  This is most likely a result of increasing public awareness of Fair  Trade, and increased pressure from consumers. Sam's Club, Wal Mart,  Dunkin' Donuts, McDonald's, and Starbucks  all offer Fair Trade  certified coffee, as do most independent coffee shops. All espresso  served at Dunkin' Donuts is Fair Trade certified, as is all coffee sold  at McDonald's in England. Starbucks coffee is one of the largest  purchasers of Fair Trade certified coffee in the world, planning to  purchase 40 million pounds of green, unroasted coffee in 2009.This  is in part because the company purchases massive quantities of coffee.  In 2008, Fair Trade certified coffee composed only 5% of the total  coffee purchased by the company.
Though large scale coffee corporations are becoming figureheads for Fair  Trade, smaller companies such as JUST COFFEE COOPERATIVE, Higher  Grounds, and Cafe Campesino are now working to successfully advocate  Fair Trade coffee. Aside from word of mouth marketing, these small  businesses are forming tour groups to various coffee producing  countries, such as Guatemala and Mexico, to show consumers first hand  what coffee farming with Fair Trade entails. These tours allow people to  become ambassadors of Fair Trade and gain support for the movement.This type of marketing provokes a growth for popularity and demand. In  2006, nearly 65 million pounds of fair-trade coffee were imported to the  U.S., 45% more than the year before, and twice as much as in 2004,  according to TransFair USA, in Oakland, Calif., the only third-party  certifier of fair-trade goods in the U.S. Trans Fair nearly doubles  every year in applicants that want to certify their coffee products.This is because over the past ten years, the demand for Fair Trade  coffee has increased significantly and will continue to grow.
Other advocates for Fair Trade coffee include various religious groups  and churches across the U.S. From Catholic to Methodist, the concept of  Fair Trade has been referenced in sermons and further enforced with  fellowship hours consisting of Fair trade coffee as part of the  refreshment.[13] Many church groups feel that this organization emulates  Christianity by carrying out good works for others and the environment.  For many of the faith-based organizations, fair trade is a way to  connect younger members with an applicable message of how to be a good  Christian.
Economics
Transnational corporations such as Procter & Gamble’s Folger's,  McDonald’s, and Starbuck’s now sell Fair Trade coffee, using their large  consumer base and strong advertising campaigns to bring in Fair Trade  consumers. Fair Trade activists[who?] are now concerned that the morally  driven small Fair-Trade-oriented businesses are going to be pushed out  of their original customer market.
When large corporations sell Fair Trade coffee, consumers are easily  brought to the larger, well known companies for their Fair Trade coffee.  This takes out the small coffee shops’ edge of selling  consumer-oriented, special coffees like Fair Trade coffee and continues  the success of big businesses in the coffee industry.
Generally, Fair Trade goods do not cost more than other goods because  the large percentage taken by middlemen is removed from the  equation.However, as a result of Fair Trade’s elimination of the  middle man, numerous jobs are removed from the market without the  guarantee of finding another. 
Ethics
Critics believe the Fair Trade certification is abused by marking up  retail prices significantly, while only providing the growers with  marginally higher prices.[15][16] When large corporations like Wal-Mart  can afford to sell Fair Trade coffee, and choose to do so as an economic  decision for profit, many consumers see the gap between large  corporations supporting Fair Trade coffee growers in other countries but  in the meantime the same corporations do not pay their workers wages  similar to their profits and often put smaller, local business owners  out of work. Some smaller sellers of Fair Trade coffee, who sell Fair  Trade coffee as more than an economic decision are losing their Fair  Trade market to these larger companies and many have suggested that  TransFair USA come up with a tiered labeling system so as to show that  these small business owners are truly committed to Fair Trade and aren’t  making the same larger profits off of the Fair Trade label that the  large corporations can.
Another criticism is that the per-pound price for Fair Trade coffee is  that of the 1990 International Coffee Organization price, which is only  moderately above the cost of production. Fair Trade farmers make  $0.20-$0.30 per pound of coffee they grow and sell and as a result do  not make much profit off of Fair Trade like the final sellers do.While some argue that Fair Trade pushes under-empowered growers into  forming cooperatives, creating islands of democracy in often autocratic  regimes, others challenge the assumption that encouraging farmers to  form cooperatives is a good idea. This is because co-ops can be just as  corrupt as any other organization. In a system meant to eliminate  middlemen that pitches itself as a direct connection to growers, co-ops  add a level of bureaucracy between consumer and producer. The farmer  doesn’t directly receive the $1.26 but instead receives whatever portion  the co-op decides. Therefore, a corruptly managed co-op can mask the  real price of coffees from individual farmers and turn a profit greater  than that of the farmers themselves.
