Dec 16, 2010

Fair trade coffee 2

Examples of community development:
Colombia: Members of the COSURCA coffee cooperative successfully prevented the cultivation of more than 1,600 acres (6.5 km2) of coca and poppy used to produce illicit drugs.
Guatemala: indigenous Tzutuhil Mayans in the La Voz cooperative are sending local kids to college for the first time. 
Peru: the CECOVASA cooperative is assisting indigenous groups in improving coffee quality and transitioning to certified organic production.
Nicaragua: The CECOCAFEN cooperative established a reproductive health program providing tests for the virus that causes cervical cancer.

In 1997, Fairtrade Labelling Organizations International, or FLO was created to support and protect disadvantaged producers within the Fair Trade market. FLO is a non-profit organization based in Bonn, Germany, that sets Fair Trade Certification standards and certifies producers.This umbrella organization has 20 labeling initiatives worldwide that work within it to certify the products. The FLO sets the price floor for the coffee. The current pricing is available on the FLO website .

Popularity
Many coffee vendors are now advertising Fair Trade certified coffee. This is most likely a result of increasing public awareness of Fair Trade, and increased pressure from consumers. Sam's Club, Wal Mart, Dunkin' Donuts, McDonald's, and Starbucks  all offer Fair Trade certified coffee, as do most independent coffee shops. All espresso served at Dunkin' Donuts is Fair Trade certified, as is all coffee sold at McDonald's in England. Starbucks coffee is one of the largest purchasers of Fair Trade certified coffee in the world, planning to purchase 40 million pounds of green, unroasted coffee in 2009.This is in part because the company purchases massive quantities of coffee. In 2008, Fair Trade certified coffee composed only 5% of the total coffee purchased by the company.

Though large scale coffee corporations are becoming figureheads for Fair Trade, smaller companies such as JUST COFFEE COOPERATIVE, Higher Grounds, and Cafe Campesino are now working to successfully advocate Fair Trade coffee. Aside from word of mouth marketing, these small businesses are forming tour groups to various coffee producing countries, such as Guatemala and Mexico, to show consumers first hand what coffee farming with Fair Trade entails. These tours allow people to become ambassadors of Fair Trade and gain support for the movement.This type of marketing provokes a growth for popularity and demand. In 2006, nearly 65 million pounds of fair-trade coffee were imported to the U.S., 45% more than the year before, and twice as much as in 2004, according to TransFair USA, in Oakland, Calif., the only third-party certifier of fair-trade goods in the U.S. Trans Fair nearly doubles every year in applicants that want to certify their coffee products.This is because over the past ten years, the demand for Fair Trade coffee has increased significantly and will continue to grow.

Other advocates for Fair Trade coffee include various religious groups and churches across the U.S. From Catholic to Methodist, the concept of Fair Trade has been referenced in sermons and further enforced with fellowship hours consisting of Fair trade coffee as part of the refreshment.[13] Many church groups feel that this organization emulates Christianity by carrying out good works for others and the environment. For many of the faith-based organizations, fair trade is a way to connect younger members with an applicable message of how to be a good Christian.

Economics
Transnational corporations such as Procter & Gamble’s Folger's, McDonald’s, and Starbuck’s now sell Fair Trade coffee, using their large consumer base and strong advertising campaigns to bring in Fair Trade consumers. Fair Trade activists[who?] are now concerned that the morally driven small Fair-Trade-oriented businesses are going to be pushed out of their original customer market.

When large corporations sell Fair Trade coffee, consumers are easily brought to the larger, well known companies for their Fair Trade coffee. This takes out the small coffee shops’ edge of selling consumer-oriented, special coffees like Fair Trade coffee and continues the success of big businesses in the coffee industry.

Generally, Fair Trade goods do not cost more than other goods because the large percentage taken by middlemen is removed from the equation.However, as a result of Fair Trade’s elimination of the middle man, numerous jobs are removed from the market without the guarantee of finding another.

Ethics
Critics believe the Fair Trade certification is abused by marking up retail prices significantly, while only providing the growers with marginally higher prices.[15][16] When large corporations like Wal-Mart can afford to sell Fair Trade coffee, and choose to do so as an economic decision for profit, many consumers see the gap between large corporations supporting Fair Trade coffee growers in other countries but in the meantime the same corporations do not pay their workers wages similar to their profits and often put smaller, local business owners out of work. Some smaller sellers of Fair Trade coffee, who sell Fair Trade coffee as more than an economic decision are losing their Fair Trade market to these larger companies and many have suggested that TransFair USA come up with a tiered labeling system so as to show that these small business owners are truly committed to Fair Trade and aren’t making the same larger profits off of the Fair Trade label that the large corporations can.

Another criticism is that the per-pound price for Fair Trade coffee is that of the 1990 International Coffee Organization price, which is only moderately above the cost of production. Fair Trade farmers make $0.20-$0.30 per pound of coffee they grow and sell and as a result do not make much profit off of Fair Trade like the final sellers do.While some argue that Fair Trade pushes under-empowered growers into forming cooperatives, creating islands of democracy in often autocratic regimes, others challenge the assumption that encouraging farmers to form cooperatives is a good idea. This is because co-ops can be just as corrupt as any other organization. In a system meant to eliminate middlemen that pitches itself as a direct connection to growers, co-ops add a level of bureaucracy between consumer and producer. The farmer doesn’t directly receive the $1.26 but instead receives whatever portion the co-op decides. Therefore, a corruptly managed co-op can mask the real price of coffees from individual farmers and turn a profit greater than that of the farmers themselves.